Eastern Kentucky
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
33  Soufiane Bouchikhi JR 31:21
54  Wade Meddles JR 31:30
55  Ben Toroitich SO 31:33
149  Thijs Nijhuis SO 32:04
301  Ole Hesselbjerg SO 32:28
390  Yosi Goasdoue JR 32:40
548  Amos Kosgey FR 33:01
553  Erwin Leysen JR 33:02
700  Daniel Jones SR 33:16
742  Mads Taersboel FR 33:21
744  Adams Ronnoh JR 33:21
851  Sean Vandermosten SO 33:32
905  Jeppe Harboe FR 33:38
925  Musa Kimuli SR 33:39
1,297  Ben Turner FR 34:11
1,608  Victor Kosgei FR 34:37
2,073  Brad Fortuna SR 35:23
2,186  Kyle Burton SO 35:30
National Rank #13 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #2 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 99.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Nationals


National Champion 0.1%
Top 5 at Nationals 6.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 35.3%
Top 20 at Nationals 86.6%


Regional Champion 44.3%
Top 5 in Regional 99.6%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Soufiane Bouchikhi Wade Meddles Ben Toroitich Thijs Nijhuis Ole Hesselbjerg Yosi Goasdoue Amos Kosgey Erwin Leysen Daniel Jones Mads Taersboel Adams Ronnoh
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 09/28 598 31:34 32:40 31:41 31:58 32:52 32:29 33:15 32:50
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 09/29 1131 33:07 33:33 33:24
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/12 511 31:18 32:07 31:14 32:17 32:22 32:33
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 1064 32:45 33:16 33:01 33:16
OVC Championships 10/27 998 32:19 32:56 33:03 33:20 33:34 33:06 33:26
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 353 30:47 31:25 31:47 31:25 32:28 32:26 32:24
NCAA Championship 11/17 647 31:13 31:10 32:51 32:16 33:57 33:55 33:52





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 99.0% 13.4 381 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.9 3.2 4.3 5.4 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.2 7.0 6.1 5.9 5.2 4.9 4.6 4.5 3.4 3.5 2.4 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1
Region Championship 100% 1.8 87 44.3 36.6 13.4 4.3 1.0 0.3 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Soufiane Bouchikhi 99.9% 35.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.1 1.5 1.9 1.7 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.3
Wade Meddles 99.3% 48.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.5
Ben Toroitich 99.2% 53.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1
Thijs Nijhuis 99.0% 126.6
Ole Hesselbjerg 99.0% 183.4
Yosi Goasdoue 99.0% 208.5
Amos Kosgey 99.0% 235.7


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Soufiane Bouchikhi 5.7 0.7 4.6 11.4 13.4 12.5 10.2 8.7 7.4 6.0 4.6 4.1 3.0 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.3
Wade Meddles 8.0 0.2 1.1 3.6 6.5 8.6 10.1 10.5 9.8 8.4 7.1 5.5 4.5 3.8 2.8 2.2 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.4
Ben Toroitich 8.5 0.1 0.7 2.6 5.0 8.4 9.5 9.5 9.7 8.5 7.2 6.1 4.9 4.3 3.6 2.7 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.7
Thijs Nijhuis 20.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.0 2.2 2.8 3.7 4.4 5.4 4.7 5.3 5.5 5.4 4.8 4.2 3.9 3.7 3.1 3.2 2.9
Ole Hesselbjerg 36.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.8
Yosi Goasdoue 46.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.8
Amos Kosgey 67.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 44.3% 100.0% 44.3 44.3 1
2 36.6% 100.0% 36.6 36.6 2
3 13.4% 100.0% 0.9 4.2 4.5 2.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 13.4 3
4 4.3% 99.5% 0.2 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.3 4
5 1.0% 42.9% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.4 5
6 0.3% 7.1% 0.0 0.3 0.0 6
7 0.1% 0.1 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 99.0% 44.3 36.6 0.9 4.3 5.5 4.0 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 80.9 18.1




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Wisconsin 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Princeton 100.0% 1.0 1.0
Northern Arizona 99.9% 1.0 1.0
Syracuse 99.7% 1.0 1.0
Georgia 99.2% 1.0 1.0
Indiana 98.6% 1.0 1.0
New Mexico 98.4% 1.0 1.0
Portland 92.2% 1.0 0.9
Notre Dame 88.9% 1.0 0.9
UCLA 84.5% 1.0 0.8
Virginia 82.0% 1.0 0.8
Iowa State 53.5% 1.0 0.5
Texas A&M 52.7% 2.0 1.1
Kansas 41.8% 1.0 0.4
Arizona State 38.4% 1.0 0.4
North Carolina St. 20.7% 2.0 0.4
Minnesota 10.7% 1.0 0.1
Washington 7.0% 1.0 0.1
Dartmouth 5.0% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 4.6% 1.0 0.0
Illinois 2.5% 2.0 0.1
Penn State 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Cal Poly 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Washington St. 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Michigan State 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Providence 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Harvard 0.3% 1.0 0.0
North Carolina 0.2% 2.0 0.0
McNeese State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Navy 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Cornell 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 13.6
Minimum 8.0
Maximum 20.0